Why might not everyone in the public share the benefits of onsite risk?

The correct answer pertains to the idea that the benefits of onsite risk management are often limited to the stakeholders directly associated with the company's operations. When risk management strategies are implemented, they are typically designed to protect the interests of the organization, its employees, and its operations. Consequently, while these measures might enhance safety or efficiency in the workplace, the surrounding community or broader public might not experience these benefits in the same way.

For example, a company may implement protocols that reduce the likelihood of accidents or environmental incidents. While employees and the organization benefit from these protocols and improved safety within the company's premises, the surrounding community may not see a direct or significant improvement in their quality of life or safety due to the company's practices.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately capture the situation. For example, the notion that risk management is always profitable does not consider the circumstances where investments in risk management may not yield immediate financial returns, nor does it connect to the public's experience. The statement about public awareness not being prioritized touches on a different issue, suggesting a lack of communication rather than the scope of benefits. Finally, the idea that members of the public are not affected by risks is misleading; risks can certainly impact them, but the specific benefits from risk management